Throughout history, humankind
has had colossal monuments erected to preserve religious and cultural beliefs,
and this has been due to the yearning to satisfy what is often termed ‘the
worship instinct in humankind’.
And architecture has
played a crucial role in cementing religious notions and codes of social
behavior since antiquity, by creating observable symbols of a common belief
system which binds a society’s collective awareness.
I imagine therefore
that the invention of ‘a straight wall’ altered humanity’s relationship with
the earth in terms of how it interacted with it when constructing what we call
modern shelters.
The curvatures and
circles which were common designs among shelters constructed by most ancient societies,
must have transformed drastically with new spatial dynamics ushered in by an
advent of structural stoicism which informed the character of houses in towns
and cities, fortresses and skyscrapers societies built.
Places of worship have
been formidable symbols of a society’s religious orientation, and in a country
like South Africa, which has been predominantly Christian over decades, we find
a myriad of such symbols populating our villages, farms, towns and cities.
And it would be
readily admissible to accept that most thought systems and moral leanings are
founded on codes of the said religion, thus allowing for even stalwarts of our
liberation struggle be drawn from the Christianised milieu.
Even though some
churches prefer worshiping outside at places such as river banks and even
under trees, most people still relish the concept of a brick and mortar
structure, adorned with a crucifix and stained windows.
Now when thinking
deeply about the social implications of revolutionary thought concocted under
the auspices of religious conviction,
would one find disadvantages or advantages in as far as the robustness of the
revolutionary fervour is concerned. Does an atheist make for a more productive revolutionary
than a religiously zealous political thinker?
Do concerns for
liberation get bogged down by sedative religious morality of Christianised
dissidents, which in turn eliminates options of armed struggled against
oppression?
Are religiously
inclined revolutionaries more lenient and soft when it comes to dealing with
the bloodcurdling realities of true revolution?
These and other
thoughts occurred to me while visiting Groutville on the coastal regions of
KwaZulu Natal, where I had the pleasure of exploring Albert Luthuli’s legacy.
Having being a presiding
minister in the church captured in the images accompanying this post, I was
left wondering how Christian dogma might have influenced certain concessions
which were made by leaders of our fight for freedom.
One can also ask if
psychological influences of religiosity are part reason for our society’s
subservient nature and cowardice when it comes to confrontational tactics of
struggle and war.
Is religion solely ‘an
opiate of the masses’, or can we argue that religion has the ability of
collectivise dissent?
I am thinking of a
number of churches that were meeting places for many revolutionaries in our
country, and wonder what impact ‘the spirit of these places’ had on the psyche
of the occupants who gathered for revolutionary purposes?
No comments:
Post a Comment